The Indian film “Auntie” is a controversial movie that earned its director an Oscar nomination.
But what exactly is it about the film that makes it so controversial?
India has a very strong cinema industry, and the film was a huge hit in India, where it was nominated for a number of awards including Best Director at the 2012 Golden Globe Awards.
The film follows the lives of the parents of a family of six children in a small village in Maharashtra.
The film was nominated as the best film at the 2011 International Documentary Film Festival, which was held in Mumbai, India.
Director Bipin Chandra Sood told Al Jazeera that the film’s title is a reference to a story about a girl who is a daughter of a wealthy person.
Sood said he wanted to portray the life of the family, and how they are coping with their everyday hardships.
Sood said the family lives in a big house with five rooms and has an apartment in the next house.
It also has a horse stable, which he said is like a mini-dungeon.
The movie has an Indian theme, but is not a typical Indian film.
“It’s a documentary that’s a very controversial movie.
You don’t see many films in India that are this controversial, because there’s a lack of cinema,” he said.
In the movie, the family is living in a trailer park, and when a young boy is accidentally killed by a deer, he is the one who gets to live the rest of his life with his mother and father.
The family is not very happy with the way the boy is being treated.
The mother complains to her daughter’s aunt that the boy does not seem to be taking care of his mother or father, and is only spending his time with his dog.
“He’s always doing his own thing,” she said.
When Sood’s film was released in the UK in 2011, the film became a major controversy.
It earned a number for its use of sound and music.
A few days after its release, the British government banned the film from being shown in cinemas, citing that it was “not acceptable for children to see children killed by deer in a film”.
The UK government later withdrew its ban, but it was criticised for not having acted more quickly to ban the film.
Sook Siong, a senior film researcher at the National Film Board of India (NFBI), told Al Arabiya English that the decision was made at the highest level of the government.
“The decision is not made at a moment when the situation is changing, or when the issue has reached a point of consensus,” she added.
The BBC’s Indian service reported that the BBC’s editor in chief, Jeremy Vine, tweeted: “This film is a shame, and its a shame that the Indian film industry is not making more films like it.”
The film’s director, Bhaskar Kapoor, also posted a series of tweets condemning the ban.
“I have seen this film on many screens and this has never crossed my mind before,” Kapoor wrote on Twitter.
Sooch Siongaon, who directed the film at NFBI, told Al Jazira English that his decision to make the film had nothing to do with the ban but was based on the fact that it had been banned in the country.
“We did not feel like we were under any pressure,” he added.
In an interview with the BBC, Sood acknowledged that the movie had made him nervous, but said he had no regrets.
“When I first heard about the ban on this film, I thought that the ban was an excuse for the ban,” he told the BBC.
Sood did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Al Jazeera.”
It is important to remember that there are many films that have been made that are not banned in India.”
Sood did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Al Jazeera.